On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Fix uhci to build with PROC_FS=n. > However, I'm not sure about the patch. > Does all of this go into debugfs now, instead of into procfs?
Your question has a trick answer. Yes, it goes into debugfs now instead of procfs. But no, not all of it does. Some of the output can go into the system log instead. This can happen when uhci_result_control (and also uhci_result_bulk, if the "#if 0" line is removed) calls uhci_show_qh. So it's correct to change #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS to #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, but you should leave it in the same place instead of moving it to the head of the source file. As for the uhci_debugfs_root declaration, there's no reason to move it to the end. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
