On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:46:07PM +1200, Gareth Williams wrote: > Perhaps a good idea (instead) would be to ask "who (apart from Zane :) > is actually *not* in favour of setting the reply to the list?". Cmon, > hands up :-)
you asked for it. please read http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html and to quote mike "read it again and again and again..." mutt has a seperate command for reples to the list: L using that, there is no need to remove Cc:s manually. there is also the Mail-FollowUp-To: header. it tells you clearly who wants a cc and who doesn't. greetings, martin. -- interrested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen training, sTeam/caudium/roxen and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world. -- pike programmer travelling in europe open-steam.org csl-gmbh.net (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin B�hr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
