Hi Vik,
I agree with Chris S. that Enlightenment menus are difficult to read if the themes are like 'bluesteel'. Not a bad manager if the visuals are ok. To get things just right in fvwm2 can take several days editing fvwmrc which most ppl are just not prepared to do. Can be very good if you persist. Afterstep is one I still havn't got used to. sWM (small Window Manager with 4 workspaces) is probably the smallest (32k binary), and looks modern due to its titlebar buttons. Won't ever turn you off visually as there is just xterm. I prefer kde to gnome/sawfish because the desktop/window menus are more ordered. My favourite window manager is wmaker because of its speed, reliablity, appearance and ease to configure and work with. One hassle is wmakers default Ctrl-Alt+arrow keys to swap workspaces because I have to take my hand off the mouse to press the arrow. Changing the shortcuts to Ctrl-Tab and Ctrl-q is a easy workaround and much faster. cheers, Keith. On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > I have fiddled with Enlightenment and find it difficult to read. > FVWM is just too difficult to re-configure. Wonderful to stop the staff > wasting time meddling, but too difficult to change anything when you actually > need to.
