I'm interested to know what reason they would have for misleading us about the design of the bomb? I guess theres so many other cover ups going on in the whole situation.
jeremyb. > From: Vik Olliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/10/18 Fri AM 08:14:11 GMT+13:00 > To: CLUG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Re: Very OT: bombing > > No, it doesn't, which is why we're being misled over the design of the > bomb. An ammonium nitrate slurry loaded with aluminium powder or the > inclusion of a large quantity of a volatile liquid (propane, acetone > etc.) over the main ANFO charge would behave like that. This is pretty > much what was done in Bali with C4 and gas cylinders. > > However, the press are reporting many instances of the use of C4 where > the explosive was in fact acetone peroxide. The shoe-bomber being a case > in point. > > Vik :v) > >
