On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 17:51, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:59, you wrote:
> > I think I should point out that that link was posted to me by one of my
> > bosses (3 notches up the hierarchy)
>
> I reckon that the ovine creature 3 rungs up should be told that the '86
> architecture is intrinsically insecure no matter what o/s is on it. Its power
> has outgrown its design. '86 was fine until people started to use it on
> networks when its innate lack of the hardware needed to support secure
> computing environments caused all the current problems.
Be careful with those sorts of statements around the Uni'. They'll have
everyone back on VMS before you know it :)
--
Michael JasonSmith http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~mpj17/
