http://lists.ethernal.org/cantlug-0208/msg00575.html
As such, it seemed CLUG in general was meeting most everyone's needs but mine. Therefore, rather than try to encourage the inclusion of things few saw as important other than me, I chose to step back and allow those who enjoyed it as is, continue to enjoy it as is. If this has changed in recent times (meaning since I stopped attending meetings etc.), please let me know and I will reconsider my involvement.
Regards,
Jason Greenwood
Nick Rout wrote:
Not wanting to go over old ground here Jason, but IIRC you wanted more talks on gui type software, which quickly degenerated into a CLI/GUI flamewar oops I mean discussion.I think someone may have suggested that you organise or conduct talks on the areas that interested you, if that has resulted in you "voting with your feet" then i think thats a shame. Maybe I have it wrong and there were some other issues i wasn't aware of. I hope you'll take part some more Jason, particularly as there is another installfest coming up. You have made a good contribution to the "group" and I hope it can continue. Nick On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:33:22 +1300 Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I will not bore the list as I am reasonably sure I have made it quite clear what I would like the CLUG to do differently. IMHO, these concerns have fallen on more than deaf ears, they have fallen on vehemently contrary ears. That is totally fine, I guess I was outnumbered. As I said, I am not trying to change the CLUG anymore, I chose to vote with my feet instead. I still wish the CLUG the very best but it doesn't meet my needs. I have therefore limited my involvement to the occasional participation on list. Nick Rout wrote:If you were the committee of one, what would you change? On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:01:35 +1300 Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:One problem with your little hypothesis/statement. It leaves no room for change/progression/evolution. All things change in time, that is the way of life. Jason Greenwood
