Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > None of the DW pages I've examined in the past passed the basic w3c > compliancy test. However, given the choice I'd use DW over FP any day.
My page at http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ is valid HTML 4.01 Transitional (but not strict). Created with Dreamweaver. It is an extremely simple page however. Most of the pages in my site are not compliant due to either missing doctypes or the occasional non-standard tag. BTW the tutor who taught the DW course I went on last year was of the opinion that you should only bother writing for MSIE. And he's done pages for several high-profile businesses. BTW2 the problem with standards is not only getting the web designers/developers to follow them, but also getting the web browsers to format the same HTML in a consistent manner. Oh and actually having complete standards helps (I never want to use frames again). Cheers, - Dave http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
