One simple piece of legislation would slow it down ... if you send it, you must be able to receive a reply to it. make it illeagel to forge headers and addresses. If people don't want it they send you an email opting out and if you don't listen they bounce it back at you. Image some stupid sdpammer sending 100 million or more spams and having 90% of them bounce back to his/her server. They would go out of business pretty soon.
Shane On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:53, you wrote: > Good to hear it. > > Wesley Parish > > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:39, you wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 17:52, you wrote: > > > Johnno wrote: > > > > There is must be many in his pills.. > > > > > > Speaking of which, how does this man go about selling "medicine" with > > > unproven claims? As a former American, I can assure you that someone > > > this bold in the States would draw the attention of the Food and Drug > > > Administration rather quickly. US spammers keep a MUCH lower profile > > > to avoid such attention. They'd be idiots for allowing themselves - > > > their PICTURE especially - to be front-page material. Especially with > > > US gun laws being what they are :) > > > > It's almost unbelievable to me that no spammer has yet deflected the > > trajectory of a small piece of metal. > > > > > If we lowered him by his toenails into a cesspool would that be > > > considered a crime here? > > > > Unfortunately, I'm sure it would be. > > > > However it looks as if something interesting is going to happen. > > > > http://www.aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/n081501.shtml -- Shane Hollis Notes Unlimited New Zealand Ph: 021 465 547 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
