On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:56:44PM +1300, Dale Anderson wrote:
> 2.6 (a desktop machine) but on a server it isnt really worth the gamble as a
> majority on improvements are towards the desktop latency side of things
I think you're forgetting the immense amount of work that went into
scalability and 'big iron' performance.
But really, people, it's easy to decide if you should be using 2.6 on
your desktop or server. If you're worried about stability at all, don't
use 2.6 yet. If you have to ask "should I be doing this?", the answer
is no.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
