True I had overlooked those improvements :) I was focusing to much on the desktop latancy bits ;-)
Cheers Dale. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Gregan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: Re: 2.6 stuff working...! > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:56:44PM +1300, Dale Anderson wrote: > > > 2.6 (a desktop machine) but on a server it isnt really worth the gamble as a > > majority on improvements are towards the desktop latency side of things > > I think you're forgetting the immense amount of work that went into > scalability and 'big iron' performance. > > But really, people, it's easy to decide if you should be using 2.6 on > your desktop or server. If you're worried about stability at all, don't > use 2.6 yet. If you have to ask "should I be doing this?", the answer > is no. > > Cheers, > -mjg > -- > Matthew Gregan |/ > /| [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
