On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:27:36 +0000
Jason Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> and a site our company designed:
> http://www.nymph1.net
> 
> Nice flash elements and the site is totally navigable with a text
> based browser too. Our client wanted to sell his guiding services
> online and he wanted a site that stood apart from his competitors. His
> site does that. Flash can be replaced by animated gif's but they are
> larger and load slower - but they do not require a plugin. Ahhh
> tradeoff's. I am a hardcore open standards/source zealot but working
> in the real world of web development means using tools I'd rather not
> sometimes. Until we have something better (like animated PNG's or
> similar) this will continue to happen. Some like flashy sites, some
> just want the content. Taken to the extreme, why not have courier font
> point size 12 for all web pages? Because it would be u-g-l-y, on that
> I'm pretty sure we can all agree. Therefore the amount of "flashiness"
> is just a matter of degree isn't it? To each his own I guess. I can't
> wait till the OSS community finishes building web development tools to
> rival the proprietary ones. Sadly, there is a ways to go yet.


hey i remember going in to sign up with plains.co.nz many years ago when
i forst got the net. the proprietor gleefully showed me that he had
discovered the <blink> tag in netscrape, and was able to make text flash
on and off. bloody annoying, uncontrollable blink rate.


by the way he blink tag was a netscape only html tag - MS weren't the
first to screw with standards.



> 
> Oh yeah, by the way, do you want your site to NOT be found by search 
> engines? Build it all in flash then! =) Flash elements are ok used in 
> moderation but the surest way to kill search engine rankings is to use
> all flash.
> 
> My .002c worth.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Jason
> 
> Chad wrote:
> 
> >>>Yes, and used sensibly Shockwave is cool/useful/whatever, at least
> >thats>>my opinion.
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>I have yet to see a site where using shockwave/flash (is there a
> >>difference?) has improved navigation, or has been used beneficially
> >>with something that wouldn't have been possible without. I have
> >however>seen many sites which are completely unusable because of it.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >http://www.dxinvisiblewar.com/
> >Is a rather nice Flash/shockwave only site not sure if it's an
> >improvement on what can be done by HTML once you take into account
> >the size of it but is nice in a rather fancy, flashy kind of way (if
> >you have broadband and a fast pc that is). And I doubt that any thing
> >similar could be produced with out using Flash or Shockwave.
> >
> >Chad
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 


Reply via email to