On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:37:46 +1200
InfoHelp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Maybe let SuSE have a go at it?
> 
> - The test box I had for Fest had that modem/OS, & went fine
> (& I've been told there's a problem with ltmodem under Mdk10).

where is this info please, it needs evaluation.

> 
> Make partition space free for SuSE install.
> Test all apps incl cam.
> Delete Mdk if no longer needed.
> 

well its an idea, but I am not sure why suse would do any differently.

> hth
> 
> Rik
> 
> Nick Rout wrote:
> 
> >I helped (or maybe hindered) with a computer last nght.. Basically we
> >got an ltmodem (Agere/Lucent) going on a mandrake box with kernel
> >2.6.3-15mdk. The MB appears to be via chipset, I'd say 3-4 years old
> >(CPU is Athlon 1000 or 1100 from memory)
> >
> >The modem connected ok, but when we started any serious surfing (read
> >clicking beyond about a google search) the computer froze hard, i mean
> >no mouse movement, no response from the keyboard, screen frozen, no
> >ability to switch to console, push the reset button frozen.
> >
> >I suspected IRQ problems, and discovered that both USB and the LTmodem
> >were sharing IRQ5. Now I understood that modern computers can share
> >irq's, but maybe there are exceptions. As the USB didn't seem to work
> >well when the modem driver was loaded I think this could well be the
> >right track.
> >
> >In the bios (and i am nervous about changing this sort of setting) it is
> >set up to auto allocate (is that the right expression) all irq's. There
> >is a facility to "reserve" irq's. There is a separate facilty to
> >allocate an irq to usb, although not a specific IRQ number, just
> >allocate or not allocate.
> >
> >Can anyone point me to the right resolution here? I suspect I should go
> >into the bios and set it to "reserve" IRQ5 so that it does not get
> >automatically allocated to USB, and is available for LTmodem to grab.
> >However I have never played with this stuff in the bios much and I am
> >not 100% aware of the implications. Certainly turning off USB altogether
> >is not an option for these people as they have a USB digicam.
> >

-- 
Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to