On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:10:10 +1200 InfoHelp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ring Kevin Owers, the Computer Broker. > > He's spent a lot of time sorting out the distro/winmodem matches that > work, & will provide more detail. > > I know he heavily favours the ltmodem, & am reporting recollected detail > here. Thanks, I'll chat to him. > > Nick Rout wrote: > > >On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:37:46 +1200 > >InfoHelp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Maybe let SuSE have a go at it? > >> > >>- The test box I had for Fest had that modem/OS, & went fine > >>(& I've been told there's a problem with ltmodem under Mdk10). > >> > >> > > > >where is this info please, it needs evaluation. > > > >>Make partition space free for SuSE install. > >>Test all apps incl cam. > >>Delete Mdk if no longer needed. > >> > >well its an idea, but I am not sure why suse would do any differently. > > > I have seen it running an ltmodem perfectly, on a box with USB ports. > I didn't test the latter, but YaST works better than hardDrake in my > experience. > > Mandrake needs script-level tweaking for trickier h/w, from what I've seen. so does SuSE with the slmodem anyway, from experience with my office machine, and Ralph's mega-laptop. > > >>hth > >> > >>Rik > >> -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
