On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:08:54PM NZST, Matthew Gregan wrote: > At 2004-09-10T18:54:53+1200, G.M. Bodnar wrote: > > > I'm still entirely against it. In fact, I'm working on the logic for > > a script that will read From: and Reply-To: and intelligently modify > > it to a sensible Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To: combination. > > More munging?
I was thinking of a display_filter setting. I don't like the idea of
modifying the message directly.
> > That way, when I'm writing a personal reply to a list discussion, I
> > know I'm sending my private comments to a private person, rather than
> > have it forced back to the list.
>
> Since you're using Mutt as your MUA, just set ignore_list_reply_to and
> you're done.
>
> With this set, and as long as you have added the list (via 'list' or
> 'subscribe' in your rc file), Mutt will reply to the address specified
> in the From: header if the Reply-To: header has been corrupted by crap
> mailing list software {,admins}.
Learning every day, even on vacation. Thanks for that. I'll have to
have another read through the manual and see if there are other nifty
things I haven't noticed.
Greg
--- -
pgpTtzCm0IjlN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
