On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:36:30AM NZST, yuri wrote: > On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:33:54 +1200, Rex Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doh! Gmail has a Reply To: Header. > > Is that configurable? > > Yes, but not thru gmail - thru the list server. It's called "munging" > and I'm now in favour of it? (I used to be anti - see list archives). > > Anyone for a munging flamefest^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdebate?
I'm still entirely against it. In fact, I'm working on the logic for a script that will read From: and Reply-To: and intelligently modify it to a sensible Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To: combination. That way, when I'm writing a personal reply to a list discussion, I know I'm sending my private comments to a private person, rather than have it forced back to the list. When it comes down to it, everybody just wants the list to push messages to the right place. I'd rather have accidents that narrow the recipients list than accidents that widen that list. Greg --- -
pgpsSoQD6flgO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
