On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 22:09 +1300, Richard Tindall wrote: > Jim Cheetham wrote: > > > On Feb 9, 2005, at 9:01 PM, Jim Cheetham wrote: > > > >> On the other hand, there is also a good position for an "open source > >> software"[1] grouping, which should include people running on > >> non-free systems, > > > > forgot my footnote, sorry ... > > > > [1]"open source software" being used as a generic phrase that should > > encompass the FSF/GNU as well as the OSI definitions. And BSD :-) And ... > > Yes, it does get confusing. Building up to a managed diversity will > require getting the foundations solid first. > > btw, your GNUz mailing list appears to be down: > http://lists.ourshack.com/mailman/listinfo/gnuz
its there as far as i can see. > > This had been a really fundamental contribution to recent LUG politics. > A shame to see it gone :-/ > > Cheers, > > Rik > -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
