grep ug$ /usr/share/dict/words
Cheers, Carl. On 19/04/07, Christopher D Maher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an inpartial by stander I think CLUG is a cool name for this list. Just think of the cool words "CLUG" rhymes with: *chug *slug *bug *dug *Doug *jug(s)...... ( ) ( ) need I go on? On 18/04/07, Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18/04/07, Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The club built off the "University of Canterbury Linux Users" list > > requires its own, fully appropriate, name. > > I must admit that I don't see any need whatsoever to change the name > of the CLUG. However, if the group agrees that it should change ... > > > > b) Canterbury Unix Users Group. > > I really like the idea of a Unix group as opposed to a Linux group, > because from my perspective Linux is just a subset of Unix. But I > generally find that Linux people are open-minded enough to learn > "Unix" knowledge without worrying about the different name. > > > Partly right. There's a 'Linux mafia' uninterested in integrity, which > > does disservice to Unix-like education, it would seem. > > Absolutely *anything* you learn about a Linux system is knowledge > gained about a Unix system. > > > "Comparing GNU/Linux and FreeBSD: The real winner is the community" > > Yes. But there is more than one community. To be honest, you are the > person who is acting to disrupt the community *here* on this list. You > put in a huge amount of valuable work with the meetings you hold in > Sydenham, but your constant running battles over *terminology* > seriously detract from the work you do elsewhere. Please consider the > consequences of your posts. More and more people will be turned off > from your practical work because of the distractions your words > present. > > -jim > -- CM>
