On Thu, September 6, 2007 7:16 pm, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:19:12 +1200
> Jim Cheetham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 06/09/07, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The last problem with sendmail reported for 8.13.8, over a year ago so
>> I think your comments could be considered overly critical, given the
>> volumes of email it processes, it's one of the biggest ( some say the
>> biggest - http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6849 ) targets.
>> >
>> > This compares well with postfix, qmail, exim and far better than
>> exchange.
>>
>> Sendmail: very capable, but with the most disgusting configuration
>> I've ever ever seen. Yes, I've written functional cf files from
>> scratch, before all that macro rubbish :-)
> Blimey! I must have been using m4 for over 15 years... how old's sendmail
> now?
>>
>> qmail: horribly fast, with the second-most disgusting configuration
>> I've ever seen. Plus is has no "features" for extension, without
>> hacking source code that has no understandable license.
> Qmail is completely unable to compete with sendmail in extremely busy
> environments ( like monday morning in the US (: ) because sendmail runs
> the mta and lda asynchronously, allowing for it to ride over those really
> busy periods and then catch up with dumping into client mailboxes when
> everything dies down. Qmail is a single pipeline from end to end. Also,
> there is *no* significant speed difference between the two. Exchange on
> the other hand is about an order of magnitude slower than both. Trust me
> on this, I've done a *lot* of benchmarking...
>>
>> postfix: does pretty much everything, as long as you find out what
>> unexpected config line to use. Very reliable, seems to be the MTA of
>> popular choice at the moment.
> I think it depends on your needs. Looking at that survey, it seems that
> Sendmail is still way out in front. Given that it doesn't come as a
> default install for anything I know of ( not even *BSD! ) that sort of
> does say something.

yes postfix is the default mta in quite a few distros actually.

-- 
Nick Rout

Reply via email to