On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:17:59 +1200 Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2007-08-28T10:38:52+1200, Steve Holdoway wrote: > > B*ll*cks. The only reason that sendmail could be less secure is because > > the configurer didn't know what they were doing. Same as all the bad press > > that php gets. Blame the workman, not the tools. > > That, and the terrible track record for security vulnerabilities, sure. > > Cheers, > -mjg > -- > Matthew Gregan |/ > /| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not for sendmail, that's for sure. There are some security vulns in php, but they are swamped by the number found in software (poorly) written in php - and it's that which gives it such a bad name. phpBB, osCommerce spring to mind, and I do seem to be rewriting large chinks of said products because of it ( and the cr*p html they produce ). Steve
pgpfsVoFOyrcK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
