You, you fix this by having only one adaptor per subnet. If you really want to have the box dually-connected, plug each interface into a different subnet.
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:17:04 -0500 "Michael Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Net Llama! > > I corrected a problem of wrong gateway and now am down to this (route > -n): Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref > UseIface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > 0 eth1 > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth1 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 > 0 lo > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > > A nearby Red Hat box with only one eth looks like this: > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref > UseIface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > 0 eth0 > 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 > lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 > 0 eth0 > > Should there be 2 lines per eth? Do you fix it by doing 'route add' and > 'route del'. > > Any help appreciated, > Michael > > On Friday 21 June 2002 08:51 am, Net Llama! wrote: > > Look at your routing table (route -n). That is where all of the > > problems lie. > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list - > http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the > above URL. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
