Why couldn't I say it like that! That was one big factor when I thought about trying KDE 3.1 - it was all or nothing.
Collins Richey wrote: > [ snips ] > > On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 13:17:26 -0500 > "Brett I. Holcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> No, I'm not anti-KDE - I just don't want to use it -. nor did I speak > My basic objection to kde or gnome or glibc or mozilla or any other > sufficiently large piece of linux software is not so much the size > (although there is a lot of bloat), but the fact that you replace all or > nothing. It's like replacing a brick wall because one brick has worked > its way loose! Also, gnome and kde seem to reinvent the basic framework > and pattern of bricks with every release. The same problem exists with > smaller projects like xfce, but you only need to replace the equivalent > of one eighth/quarter of a wall. > > >> > Man, you anti-KDE guys kill me. >> > You haven't used KDE since 2.2.1, yet you're willing to speak on how >> > bad it is? >> > >> > If you want to dislike KDE, fine, but don't you think you should >> > base your opinion on something a little more current? >> > -- Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] AKA Grunt <>< Registered Linux User #188143 Remove R777 to email _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
