On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote:On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: >> Maybe it's not cooked yet. > > The patch didn�t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn�t > even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so rejects > and way to much fuzz...
huh? the only discrepancy that i got was: patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines). patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
other than that it was smooth sailing.
I didn't even get that error.
hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset tarball? I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday morning. i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the world was changed at some point.
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
8:20am up 14 days, 16:34, 1 user, load average: 0.54, 0.52, 0.77
_______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
