Quoth Net Llama!: > On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote: > > >On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: > >>On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: > >>>> Maybe it's not cooked yet. > >>> > >>> The patch didn�t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn�t > >>> even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so rejects > >>> and way to much fuzz... > >> > >>huh? the only discrepancy that i got was: > >>patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c > >>Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines). > >>patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c > >> > >> > >>other than that it was smooth sailing. > > > >I didn't even get that error. > > hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset > tarball? I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday > morning. i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the world was > changed at some point.
I�m using 2.4.19 + patch to 2.4.20 + patch to 2.4.21. Kurt -- What this world needs is a good five-dollar plasma weapon. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
