On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:14 pm, Net Llama! wrote: > On 06/14/03 09:05, Bruce Marshall wrote: > > On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:24 am, Net Llama! wrote: > >> On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote: > >> > On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: > >> >> On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: > >> >> >> Maybe it's not cooked yet. > >> >> > > >> >> > The patch didn�t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I > >> >> > didn�t even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or > >> >> > so rejects and way to much fuzz... > >> >> > >> >> huh? the only discrepancy that i got was: > >> >> patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c > >> >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines). > >> >> patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> other than that it was smooth sailing. > >> > > >> > I didn't even get that error. > >> > >> hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset > >> tarball? I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday > >> morning. i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the > >> world was changed at some point. > > > > Using a full tarball. > > that throws my theory out. so, can anyone explain what the new option > 'PGE extensions' is under 'processor type & features'? it looks to be > something useful on pentium compatibles for high memory support, but i > can't find a good explanation that doesn't require me to have a degree > in hardware engineering.
This is getting pretty weird.... I don't see that option. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 06/14/03 12:27 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "Integrity has no need for rules." _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
