On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:24 am, Net Llama! wrote: > On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote: > > On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: > >> On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: > >> >> Maybe it's not cooked yet. > >> > > >> > The patch didn�t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I > >> > didn�t even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so > >> > rejects and way to much fuzz... > >> > >> huh? the only discrepancy that i got was: > >> patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c > >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines). > >> patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c > >> > >> > >> other than that it was smooth sailing. > > > > I didn't even get that error. > > hrmmmm...are you using a full 2.4.21 tarball, or just the patchset > tarball? I'm using the full tarball, downloaded early yesterday > morning. i'm starting to wonder if what got dumped out to the world > was changed at some point.
Using a full tarball. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 06/14/03 12:05 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory." _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
