On 06/14/03 09:22, David A. Bandel wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:48:42 -0400
Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

don�t know why you guys are having such problems.  The
linux-2.4.21-xfs.<blah> patch (not yet in 2.4.21 directory, but in the
snapshot directory) worked fine.  My situation:
I opened 2.4.19, patched to .20 then to .21 then applied the xfs patch.

So you used this? ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/patches/weekly-snapshot-patch/linux-2.4.21-xfs-2003-06-13.patch.bz2


That's most definitely not the same as this: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.3/kernel_patches/linux-2.4.21-core-xfs-1.3.0.patch.gz

by about 800k :)

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:                    http://netllama.ipfox.com

9:25am up 14 days, 17:39, 1 user, load average: 0.91, 0.69, 0.68

_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to