Quoth Net Llama!:On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: >>Maybe it's not cooked yet. > >The patch didn�t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn�t even >bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so rejects and way >to much fuzz...
huh? the only discrepancy that i got was: patching file linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 1193 (offset 7 lines). patching file linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
It is beginning to look like PEBCAK.
Well, PEBCAK for a few of us. Doesn't help that there are multiple, different 2.4.21 XFS patches at ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
1:10pm up 14 days, 21:24, 1 user, load average: 0.43, 0.14, 0.04
_______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
