On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:30:18 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 06/14/03 09:22, David A. Bandel wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:48:42 -0400
> > Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > don�t know why you guys are having such problems.  The
> > linux-2.4.21-xfs.<blah> patch (not yet in 2.4.21 directory, but in
> > the snapshot directory) worked fine.  My situation:
> > I opened 2.4.19, patched to .20 then to .21 then applied the xfs
> > patch.
> 
> So you used this?
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/patches/weekly-snapshot-patch/linux-2.4.21-xfs-2003-06-13.patch.bz2
> 
> 
> That's most definitely not the same as this:

and that's my fault?  I used the above snapshot and had no problems. 
Don't know about the below patch, didn't grab it.

> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.3/kernel_patches/linux-2.4.21-core-xfs-1.3.0.patch.gz
> 
> by about 800k  :)

bigger doesn't make it better

use what works, forget what doesn't. ;-)

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
                Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to