On Thursday 24 July 2003 07:56 am, David A. Bandel wrote: > It's not the compilation that will get you, but the little things that > you will forget to include or include as modules. In that respect, 2.6 > is a nightmare. It's getting to the point that not just anyone can > compile their own kernel and expect it to work. The config script needs > simplification. > > Ciao, > > David A. Bandel
I have tried over recent months and none worked. So the explanation lies above. In many respects its a real pity, as that was to many, part of the fun of Linux, being able to compile your own kernel. They do call it progress but I see progress contains many losses as well as 'gains'. Do the gains outweigh the losses, in many cases I think not. As you say though it often gets back to the old bain, insufficient or bad documentation. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161 Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
