On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:56:37 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:37:25 -0400 > Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I do not know what i did differently, obviously something but I am > > now > > > > connected with both XP and linux, plus the secondary machine is now > > also online. So my major problem is now solved. What can I do next > > to keep everyone busy, I know i'll do a 2.6 compile. > > > > All jokes aside many thanks to all those who put in their .05 cents > > worth. > > It's not the compilation that will get you, but the little things that > you will forget to include or include as modules. In that respect, > 2.6 is a nightmare. It's getting to the point that not just anyone > can compile their own kernel and expect it to work. The config script > needs simplification. > At least they got rid of the make mrproper and make deps stuff. IMO, that's a very positive step. If you screw something up, change the config and remake, it's very quick. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
