On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:46:19 -0600
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 06:56:37 -0500
> "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:37:25 -0400
> > Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I do not know what i did differently, obviously something but I am
> > > now
> > > 
> > > connected with both XP and linux, plus the secondary machine is
> > > now also online. So my major problem is now solved. What can I do
> > > next to keep everyone busy, I know i'll do a 2.6 compile.
> > > 
> > > All jokes aside many thanks to all those who put in their .05
> > > cents worth.
> > 
> > It's not the compilation that will get you, but the little things
> > that you will forget to include or include as modules.  In that
> > respect, 2.6 is a nightmare.  It's getting to the point that not
> > just anyone can compile their own kernel and expect it to work.  The
> > config script needs simplification.
> > 
> 
> At least they got rid of the make mrproper and make deps stuff.  IMO,
> that's a very positive step.  If you screw something up, change the
> config and remake, it's very quick.

Actually, mrproper is still there and has its utility.  Try `make help`
to see how things have changed.  I'm writing a document on all this to
post on my website to help folks along.

Ciao,

David A. Bandel
-- 
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
                Nemesis Racing Team motto
GPG key autoresponder:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to