my vote is for option no2.
Regards,
Mohan Patelkhana
From: David Kirk <davidrk...@gmail.com>
To: Canterbury Linux Users Group <linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 17 May 2016 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account
Hi Chris,
The balance is about $470.
So, we have three suggestions so far.
1. Drink it away2. Transfer it to Rik to use for Software Freedom Day and his
monthly meetings3. Donate to the Free Software Foundation
I'm not a big fan of drinking it away, but it's not my money. The group can
decide.
Rik, are you reading this? I'm happy for the money to go to you. Do you have
some ideas about what you would use it for?
I'm also fine with donating to FSF or other open source groups.
Lets vote.
Thanks
David
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:53 PM csawtell <csawt...@gmail.com> wrote:
The "politically correct" thing to do with the remaining bank balance would be
to gift it to the Free Software Foundation. I would not have any qualms putting
my signature to a payment document which did this.
btw : . What is the balance?
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.-------- Original message --------From:
Criggie <crig...@criggie.org.nz> Date: 16/05/2016 15:17 (GMT+12:00) To:
linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz Subject: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:37:08 +1200
From: Derek Smithies <derek.smith...@gmail.com>
To: Canterbury Linux Users Group <linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz>
Subject: Re:
Message-ID: <5738ec04.2020...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
> I think the real question is:: What does CLUG do that makes a really
good reason to keep going?
> We could all go down to the local and have a drink up...
I'd rather you didn't - that's the sort of thing that ends up misreported
in the newspaper.
Since there is no clug, anyone can do what they want. This is one of the
times where no-clug is a bad thing.
Formalised groups have wind-up proceedings as part of their charter. Clug
doesn't.
So David - you could do anything or nothing, completely without
consultation or approval.
I'd make a suggestion that we consider these groups as worthy possible
recipients for some or all of the funds.
* Rik, for his ongoing work in the OSS field.
* UOC for their contribution of mailing list, this being the only thing
that holds CLUG together
* WLUG, for being an Incorporated Society and doing the FOS/OSS thing.
Noone's used horse in a long time. I'm happy to turn it off.
This is assuming that David can take money out of the bank without losing
arms, legs or an entire firstborn.
Thoughts?
--
Criggie
http://criggie.org.nz/
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
