On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Karlsson Kent - keka wrote: > Keld, please do not pretend that informative documents are normative > just because you want them to be normative. This particular document > was demoted by WG20 **_just because_ it was deemed highly inappropriate > to have 14652 as normative**. Could this debate be taken elsewhere. Perhaps there is a random-standards-pedantry list? -- Robert Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Sandra O'donnell USG
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Sandra O'donnell USG
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Robert Brady
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Markus Kuhn
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
