On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Karlsson Kent - keka wrote: > > > All together now: DTR 14652 is **NOT** going to be an > International Standard! It FAILED to become a standard due to > stong critisism (which the editor did not want to move on). > It was retargeted to be a Technical Report, and as such it > will be an informative, NOT a normative, document. You are right in that 14652 is not going to be an ISO International Standard, it is going to be an ISO Technical Report. This may still have normative parts. Kind regards Keld - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Karl Koehler
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Sandra O'donnell USG
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Sandra O'donnell USG
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Keld J�rn Simonsen
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Keld J�rn Simonsen
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Keld J�rn Simonsen
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Robert Brady
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Markus Kuhn
- RE: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fonts) Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: Standards (Re: Arabic in fixed width fon... Keld J�rn Simonsen
