Gaspar Sinai writes: > > 555c555 > > < 0x12678 0x30D7 > > --- > > > 0x12678 0x31F7 0x309A
> If we use 0x30D7 we will clash with: > > Table 5 row 4 column 8 > 0x8376 0x2557 0x30D7 # 1-5-55 (55 == 0x37) Yes, this character is a 'small' variant of 0x30D7. I concede. Let's use 0x31F7 0x309A. It will be the task of the display engine to position the small circle at the right position. > But what shall we do with 0x12B65 0xFFFD? > Maybe another symbol added to Unicode Yi radicals? Can you move this issue to the unicode.org mailing list? > 7950c7951 > < 0x17624 0xFA3E > --- > > 0x17624 0x69EA You are right. Let's use 0x69EA here. Also can you tell the unicode.org people to add this one to Unihan.txt? Bruno -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
