[[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 08/11] bsp/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt: Add 
support for Time-Sensitive Network] On 06/03/2023 (Mon 16:52) Naveen Saini via 
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Naveen Saini <[email protected]>
> ---
>  bsp/intel-common/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt.scc | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/bsp/intel-common/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt.scc 
> b/bsp/intel-common/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt.scc
> index 8ec001cb..9ce0b97a 100644
> --- a/bsp/intel-common/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt.scc
> +++ b/bsp/intel-common/intel-corei7-64-preempt-rt.scc
> @@ -11,3 +11,6 @@ include ktypes/preempt-rt/preempt-rt.scc
>  include intel-common-drivers.scc
>  include intel-developer-drivers.scc
>  include intel-corei7-64.scc
> +
> +# Time-Sensitive Network
> +include features/tsn/tsn.scc

There is at least a decade worth of i7 CPU out there that don't have TSN
support, IIRC.

I can't help but think that this, and a lot of the other options you've
enabled in this series are aimed at the latest and greatest, but will
just add bloat to a lot of other lower end (and older) x86-64 platforms.
Especially anything that lands in intel-common/intel-common-drivers.scc

I can't really tell what the goal was, since your series didn't have the
typical "[0/11] intel: add options for ...."  explanation preamble.

But it seems like perhaps maybe it is time to create a new file under
the bsp/intel-common dir that reflects a certain board or family of
products that have these features -- vs. being confined to the existing
categorization dictated by existing files?

Maybe you can describe what your end goal was, and we can go from there.

Paul.
--

> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

> 
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12226): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/12226
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/97420986/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to