Hi, On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:24:13PM -0400, Alan Ott wrote: > On 03/12/2013 07:36 PM, Alexander Aring wrote: > > I don't know if this patch is necessary. I think Alan told about this > > some days ago. In my case I setting my irq_type with a device_tree and I > > know other boards, which are not using a device_tree, do the same in the > > boardspecific code file in arch/arm/**/*_board.c. > > The at86rf230 supports generating multiple types of IRQ (eg: rising and > falling). His patch makes it configurable, in case it's being connected > to a board or SoC that is not as configurable. > > In the device tree or board file (in your example), you're setting the > IRQ type that the board or SoC should expect. This patch sets the IRQ > type that the at86rf230 will generate. > > > I would only add this, if this is really necessary to setup irq_type at > > probing time. > > If you want something other than the default from the at86rf230, then it > is necessary. >
Ok, thanks. Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Linux-zigbee-devel mailing list Linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-zigbee-devel
