Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>
> Ah... Les cons !
euh... tu vas pas un peu vite?
�a existe que sur red-hat7 kgcc non ? en tout cas il est pas sur la debian non
plus...
ici j'arrive jamais � me faire un noyau stable avec le framebuffer en utilisant
gcc 2.95.2, mais sans le framebuffer �a marche bien, j'ai compil� des 2.2.18
pour K6 et PII qui marchent bien. j'avais donc conclus que c'est le framebuffer
qui deconnait (atyfb)
'gcc 2.95.2 may also work but is not as safe'
comme il dit �a, ce n'est pas tr�s parlant... peut �tre avec certains modules,
sur certaines machines? en tout cas je connais d'autres gens qui ont compil�s
leur noyau avec �a sans probl�me, et je ne pense pas que la version debian soit
speciale (contrairement au noyau d'origine de la potato par exemple)
gcc c'est un peu comme la gorgone en ce moment :/
un monstre multicephale qu'il ne faut pas regarder en face
sous peine d'�tre p�trifi� par tant de disparit�s ;)
bien dommage IMHO
le message de linus qui me fait croire que kgcc existe que sur rh7:
Friday, December 14, 2000 - Linus Torvalds said:
"Quite frankly, anybody who uses Red Hat 7.0 and their broken
compiler for anything is going to have trouble.
"I don't know why RH decided to do their idiotic gcc-2.96 release
(it certainly wasn't approved by any technical gcc people - the gcc
people were upset about it too), and I find it even more surprising
that they apparently KNEW that the compiler they were using was
completely broken. They included another (non-broken) compiler, and
called it "kgcc."
"'kgcc' stands for "kernel gcc", apparently because (a) they
realized that a miscompiled kernel is even worse than miscompiling
some random user applications and (b) gcc-2.96 is so broken that it
requires special libraries for C++ vtable chunks handling that is
different, so the working gcc can only be used with programs that do
not need such library support. Namely the kernel.
"In case it wasn't obvious yet, I consider Red Hat 7.0 to be
basically unusable as a development platform, and I hope RH
downgrades their compiler to something that works better RSN. It
apparently has problems compiling stuff like the CVS snapshots of X
etc too (and obviously, anything you compile under gcc-2.96 is not
likely to work anywhere else except with the broken libraries)."
a+
--
rno
http://www.noospot42.f2s.com/
[ Soyez pr�cis dans vos sujets svp afin de d�terminer directement ]
[ le type de demande... ]
[ Pour vous (d�s)inscrire, aller sur http://linuxbe.org/ml.php ]
[ http://LinuxBe.org Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
