On 25-Oct-06, at 8:23 PM, jtd wrote:
And if someone does not agree to GPLv3 becomes crook!.
If u dont agree with v3 roll your own and release under v2. However
if i write something under v3 everone HAS to accept cause i own the
copyrights
you seem to be unaware that the gpl (any version) represents only a
small subset of licenses available. In fact, as of now, the most
popular license appears to be the Mozilla Public License. Further, i
just went through the draft of v3 - it is a nightmare. If adopted by
anyone, it is going to cause endless confusion. V2, on the other hand
was a model of simplicity compared to this. Compare the gpl to
creative commons licences and you will understand the difference. Or
compare it to the MPL.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
