On 8/21/07, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:52, Vivek J. Patankar wrote: > > Mohan Nayaka wrote: > > > Does anyone know any DNS servers better than MTNL's? > > > > I don't know if these are better, but they work for me without any > > trouble. > > > > 202.56.230.5 > > 202.56.240.5
202.56.240.5 works for me: it is as good as mtnl's primary dns (203.94.227.70) and twice as good as mtnl's sec. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ping 202.56.240.5 ... --- 202.56.240.5 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.520/15.738/15.957/0.251 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ping 203.94.227.70 ... --- 203.94.227.70 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 12.529/13.178/13.827/0.649 ms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ping 203.94.243.70 ... --- 203.94.243.70 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.889/32.763/33.638/0.893 ms > > Those are Bharti (Airtel's) public DNS servers. I'd not recommend using > them since one day Airtel may get a clue and stop them acting as public > relays. Hmm... -- The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
