On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 23:54 +0530, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह)
wrote:
> KK,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Krishnakant<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Look at this real situation.
> > What should we do with such terrorists sitting in the educational
> > sector.
> > On one hand we are facing terrorism from companies like Microsoft which
> > will play all these dirty games and to help them the other side is our
> > government where such currupted pimps are sitting to spoil all the
> > educational system by denying even the basic freedom of choosing a
> > software as small as a web browser.
> 
> I would strongly suggest that we refrain from using word like
> "terrorist" to describe rival businesses/technologies.
> 
Terrorists try forcing people to believe and behave the way they expect
by creating all kinds of environments including FUD.
I don't care what business rivalry you are talking about.  I am not
concerned about whether m$ makes million or billian dollers.  And I
don't know and not interested to know who are their business rivals.
All that I understand is that a very basic freedom of choice is being
taken away.

> That way you are diluting the meaning of word terrorist - who KILLS
> INNOCENT PEOPLE without any reason or remorse.
> 
Ok then this is criminal to the least extent.
> >
> > happy hacking.
> > Krishnakant.
> 
> Let us be responsible in choosing our words. (remember, you objecting
> to people calling crackers as hackers?)
> 
> With regards,
> -- 
Yes cracking is *NOT* hacking and denying freedom forcefully is nothing
less than terrorisom.

happy *HACKING*
Krishnakant.
Ps:
moderator or the list may ban me for speaking the "kadwa sach " (bitter
truth ).
And I am nto a businessman who fears of loosing some clients.

Krishnakant.


-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to