Krishnakant wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 23:54 +0530, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह)
> wrote:
>
>> KK,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Krishnakant<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Look at this real situation.
>>> What should we do with such terrorists sitting in the educational
>>> sector.
>>> On one hand we are facing terrorism from companies like Microsoft which
>>> will play all these dirty games and to help them the other side is our
>>> government where such currupted pimps are sitting to spoil all the
>>> educational system by denying even the basic freedom of choosing a
>>> software as small as a web browser.
>>>
>> I would strongly suggest that we refrain from using word like
>> "terrorist" to describe rival businesses/technologies.
>>
>>
> Terrorists try forcing people to believe and behave the way they expect
> by creating all kinds of environments including FUD.
> I don't care what business rivalry you are talking about. I am not
> concerned about whether m$ makes million or billian dollers. And I
> don't know and not interested to know who are their business rivals.
> All that I understand is that a very basic freedom of choice is being
> taken away.
>
>
>> That way you are diluting the meaning of word terrorist - who KILLS
>> INNOCENT PEOPLE without any reason or remorse.
>>
>>
> Ok then this is criminal to the least extent.
>
>>> happy hacking.
>>> Krishnakant.
>>>
>> Let us be responsible in choosing our words. (remember, you objecting
>> to people calling crackers as hackers?)
>>
>> With regards,
>> --
>>
> Yes cracking is *NOT* hacking and denying freedom forcefully is nothing
> less than terrorisom.
>
> happy *HACKING*
> Krishnakant.
> Ps:
> moderator or the list may ban me for speaking the "kadwa sach " (bitter
> truth ).
> And I am nto a businessman who fears of loosing some clients.
>
> Krishnakant.
>
>
>
I don't think "Happy Hacking" is offensive. :|
Hacking IS good in FREE world. Absolutely CRACKING is NOT.
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
