On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 00:22 +0530, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Prashant Verma<[email protected]> wrote: > > At 11:54 PM 6/27/2009, દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश wrote: > >>KK, > >>... > >>That way you are diluting the meaning of word terrorist - who KILLS > >>INNOCENT PEOPLE without any reason or remorse. > >>... > >>Let us be responsible in choosing our words. (remember, you objecting > >>to people calling crackers as hackers?) > > > > Nice try Dinesh. But whether you will get through > > at all to KK is doubtful. In my last interaction > > with him, he strongly reminded me of Humpty > > Dumpty (a character in "Through the Looking Glass"). > > I never intend to get through to KK. :-) He is RMS++ ;-) > Thanks Dinesh. But I am not even .01% as great and revolutionary as RMS. If that was a complement then really I don't deserve it. And if that was a tonting statement it also means that RMS is stupid kk ==. And there will be people to talk about this but that's for a later time. I know there are people who talk all kind of crap behind the back of RMS who actually has laid the roots for this huge revolution. > It was directed to people on the list (there are others you know?). > And that's why I have used "we" instead of "you". ;-) > Very good. I think every one should follow Prashant's advice of "ignoring me ". but alas, those same people actually respond. And While I am no where near RMS, I would at least make an attempt to carry his message as little as I can. Unfortunately my words carry some waitage thanks to the mentoring I got from the right people at the right time.
> > Excerpted from here: http://www.sabian.org/Alice/lgchap06.htm : > > > > <start excerpt> > > > > `But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument",' Alice objected. *glory* for what? I never had it and don't want it like politicians. > > > > `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in > > rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I > > choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.' again *I* think again. There are enough evidance of people supporting my arguements. > > > > <end excerpt> > > :-D Nice and apt. good attempt, except that the basic asumtion *i* was wrong. happy hacking. Krishnakant. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
