On Saturday 26 November 2011 14:38:41 Shamit Verma wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Binand Sethumadhavan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please explain how Aadhar will stop this. > > Being a centralized system, land purchase in name of B would be > reported to Tax authorities based on national ID.They can validate if > B has shown enough income to afford this land. And if he is paying > taxes on that income. > > Similarly, PoA would have IDs of both B and A. This can again be used > to track properties that are controlled by A.
They can be used to track EVERYTHING. But can also be faked. Which means it is a double problem. > > Right now, A can "invent" hundreds of fictitious B's since IDs do not > require biometrics. ID that is used in case of property transactions > happens to be PAN. Repeat: do your home work. You can have equal hundreds with biometrics. That apart it still hasnt sunk into your head that it is we the people who decide in a democracy. Not the state. Infact the state does not have a right to collect biometrics. The permission for NPR was pushed thru without an iota of discussion. Right now there is a push to link UID with health records - WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. Next your insurance will be linked to that. The UIDAI is illegal. The bill was not tabled in parliament and a case has been filed today in B'lore. > -- > http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
