On 11/26/2011 10:08 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:29:22 Shamit Verma wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Land registration is a state subject. IT is a central subject. Why? >> That does not matter. All property transactions over 30 lakh have to >> be reported by registrar to IT. >> >> This is part of "Annual Information Return" and these transactions are >> part of "High Value Transactions" that have to be reported to IT. > Roam around a leetile outside your glass cage. You might yet learn a thing or > two. Do you know how much land an be purchased under multiple Rs. 30 Lakhs?. > I know of one minister in the Maharashtra state cabinet holding over 1000 > acres, benami. And this guy is relatively small fry. > Another one's kith and kin holds proly 10% of Maharashtra. > > How come they never get reported. Oh btw RTIs filed say they dont hold any > land or miniscule holdings. > > The first flawed presumption is that people dont have identity > The second flawed presumption is that biometrics are unique > The third flawed presumption is that biometrics are constant > The fourth flawed presumption is that corruption is caused at the last mile > The fifth flawed presumption is that tracing transactions will stop corruption > The sixth flawed assumption is that the state is a protector > The seventh flawed assumption is that data is rarely misused > The eighth flawed assumption is that entitlements are refused due to lack of > identity > The ninth flawed assumption is that the existing id's are broken so a new one > is a must > The tenth flawed assumption is that issue processes can be made substantially > better by tech fixes inherent in the 9th assumption > > I could go on forever. But it requires a greatly nuanced understanding of > power, democracy, governance, history, our society and lastly technology. > No amount of technology cotton wool is going to help. > > We havent even got around to talking of probable corruption in the UIDAI!!!! > L1 technolgies the sole supplier of the core de dup and iris scan tech - > there > are multiple vendors, but only one tech source (an absolutely similiar > situation to M$, patents, monopoliy games and underhand dealings included), > has been convicted of fraud in Georgia for willfully issuing duplicate > driving licences (LAMAO). The directors of this company were former homeland > security officials, who awarded huge contracts to L1, and on retirement > joined L1 (ROTFL at you innocent ignorants). > > My dear sirs Mr. NN is no innocent corporate honcho, and the UIDAI is not the > god send you all think it is. It is an abomination whose hydra heads you > havent even begun to see. Research the money on EDGAR and if you are clever > you will learn. > If the process is wrong then expose it but provide alternatives too.
A little deviation from the topic, a nuclear powered submarine of the US Navy can travel and stay submerged for 30 years without re-surfacing (As seen on TV). If we can harness similar technologies to run railway engines and ships and trucks for many years without re-fuelling it would be such a lovely thing. But we will have the nay sayers who will oppose nuclear technology completely instead of focussing on making it safer and more innovative. -- Freedom is a shared resource. Take some, leave the rest for others. Please trim your replies. Avoid cross posting to other lists. Post your replies below the relevant original text, leaving a line space. Regards, Rony. http://ronybill.blogspot.com/ -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
