On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:29:22 Shamit Verma wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Land registration is a state subject. IT is a central subject. Why?
>
> That does not matter. All property transactions over 30 lakh have to
> be reported by registrar to IT.
>
> This is part of "Annual Information Return" and these transactions are
> part of "High Value Transactions" that have to be reported to IT.

Roam around a leetile outside your glass cage. You might yet learn a thing or 
two. Do you know how much land an be purchased under multiple Rs. 30 Lakhs?.
I know of one minister in the Maharashtra state cabinet holding over 1000 
acres, benami. And this guy is relatively small fry.
Another one's kith and kin holds proly 10% of Maharashtra.

How come they never get reported. Oh btw RTIs filed say they dont hold any 
land or miniscule holdings.

The first flawed presumption is that people dont have identity
The second flawed presumption is that biometrics are unique
The third flawed presumption is that biometrics are constant
The fourth flawed presumption is that corruption is caused at the last mile
The fifth flawed presumption is that tracing transactions will stop corruption
The sixth flawed assumption is that the state is a protector
The seventh flawed assumption is that data is rarely misused
The eighth flawed assumption is that entitlements are refused due to lack of 
identity
The ninth flawed assumption is that the existing id's are broken so a new one 
is a must
The tenth flawed assumption is that issue processes can be made substantially 
better by tech fixes inherent in the 9th assumption

I could go on forever. But it requires a greatly nuanced understanding of 
power, democracy, governance, history, our society and lastly technology.
 No amount of technology cotton wool is going to help.

We havent even got around to talking of probable corruption in the UIDAI!!!!
L1 technolgies the sole supplier of the core de dup and iris scan tech - there 
are multiple vendors, but only one tech source (an absolutely similiar 
situation to M$, patents, monopoliy games and underhand dealings included), 
has been convicted of fraud in Georgia for willfully issuing duplicate 
driving licences (LAMAO). The directors of this company were former homeland 
security officials, who awarded huge contracts to L1, and on retirement 
joined L1 (ROTFL at you innocent ignorants).

My dear sirs Mr. NN is no innocent corporate honcho, and the UIDAI is not the 
god send you all think it is. It is an abomination whose hydra heads you 
havent even begun to see. Research the money on EDGAR and if you are clever 
you will learn.
--
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to