Hi Tim, Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ...
Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does this make any difference as the bd_size will be filled with the correct length value anyway ? Moreover what is the difference between bcom_submit_next_buffer() and bcom_submit_next_buffer2() ? The same with bcom_retrieve_buffer() and bcom_retrieve_buffer2(). Why are these functions implemented unequally ? Best regards, Daniel Schnell. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
