On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Daniel Schnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Continuing the discussion on the mailing list ... > > Looking at the original patch I don't undestand why you had to duplicate > the bestcomm data structures and functions. The only apparent difference > is that you have a minimal data length of 2 bytes instead of 1. Does > this make any difference as the bd_size will be filled with the correct > length value anyway ?
The "new" version of the patch does this the correct way. I just haven't back ported this to the 2.6.24 version that I sent you. Tim _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
