On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:49:51PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> 
> Any comments on this or other suggestions?

I want to put this on hold until I have a chance to really test your
scheme.

There are really two issues:

1. The filter algorithm itself.
2. How the new filter fits into the SW design.

Although I am not convinced about #1, I really won't mind merging the
filter as an option, as long as #2 is cleanly handled.  But if the
code is "in line" unconditionally, then it really has to work for
everybody.

Thanks,
Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel

Reply via email to