Why do you also introduce the set action?
This is a snip from port_management_set:
static int port_management_set(struct port *target,
struct port *ingress, int id,
struct ptp_message *req)
{
...
switch (id) {
case TLV_MASTERONLY:
mtd = (struct management_tlv_datum *) tlv->data;
master_only = !!mtd->val;
respond = 1;
if (!!target->master_only != master_only) {
if (target->bmca == BMCA_NOOP && target->transport != TRANS_UDS) {
if (master_only) {
target->state_machine = designated_master_fsm;
} else if (clock_slave_only(target->clock)) {
target->state_machine = designated_slave_fsm;
} else {
pr_err("Please enable at least one of masterOnly
or slaveOnly when BMCA == noop.\n");
respond = 0;
}
} else {
target->state_machine =
clock_slave_only(target->clock) ? ptp_slave_fsm : ptp_fsm;
}
if (respond) {
target->master_only = master_only;
port_dispatch(target, EV_INITIALIZE, 0);
}
}
break;
...
}
ciao
luigi
Il giorno gio 22 apr 2021 alle ore 15:06 Erez Geva
<erez.geva....@siemens.com> ha scritto:
>
> As we support the new master only flag.
> Add the master only TLV to pmc tool.
>
> Erez Geva (1):
> Add master only management TLV
>
> pmc.c | 5 +++++
> pmc_common.c | 2 ++
> port.c | 6 ++++++
> tlv.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxptp-devel mailing list
> Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
--
Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
My Professional Profile
"UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its
simplicity." [cit.]
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
